Marco Pirroni 1 - Interview 2006

 Home >> Punk Bands >> The Models >> Marco Pirroni - 1

 

  Part1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7

This conversation was conducted in late September 2006 at a private club in Soho, London. Marco arrived about 2 seconds before I did i.e. bang on time and it wasn't his fault I got drunk after two glasses of wine and started making bizarre demands that he draw pictures and write things on napkins.

Please note that the more outrageous statements in this interview are not to be taken seriously, I just can't be bothered writing (laughter) all the way through it. There are also some rather strange jumps in continuity. This is where we veered off subject just a bit too much and I have cut it for reasons of space (and personal safety). Otherwise, to be read at maximum volume, with love. MsD. xx

MP: Go on then.

MsD: Can you remember doing the Peel sessions with the Models? Was it just the one session?

Yeh.

Was it a big deal for you?

Yeah, it was quite a big deal. Going into a studio in those days, it was something you hardly ever did, you did it two days a year, if you were lucky. Everybody's got a studio at home now so it's not big deal anymore.

Have you heard those tracks since? Do you want them?

No. Do I want them? Um, not really. I think they came out sounding better than our record. I can't remember.

Why did you put Freeze on the back of Man of the Year, or vice-versa?

I don't know. I think it was Miles' idea. It was Miles' label – it was supposed to be Mark P's label, but it wasn't, it was Miles' label. He said “they're your two best songs, put them out together.

Marco at home in 2003, photograph by Sylvi Temple.

"I keep jelly at home on display to impress my celebrity friends"   (In case you thought it was anything as ostentatious as a jukebox)

Why not separately? With a double A-side you halve the play.

Yeah, that whole double-A-side thing I could never understand, I don't think the Ants ever did, no, we never done one. We could never understand it, they only ever play one A-side. Robbie Williams did this double A-side which was No Regrets with Antmusic, and of course Antmusic got no airplay ..

I didn't know it was a double-A-side.

No, I didn't know either till afterwards. It's great he did it, but .. I don't think double A sides work. Certainly not now.

How did the Beastly Cads evolve into the Models?

The Beastly Cads were The Models, they just changed their name. It was a name I thought of, they thought it was really stupid. I wanted us to be called Lord Snooty and His Pals, because I thought that was the anti-punk name, but they said “No, that's really fucking stupid”, so we were The Beastly Cads for two gigs, then I was outvoted and we had to change our name to The Models, which I was always hated, not being at all modelly-looking, I was always really embarrassed about it.

Well, it can mean other things …

I never knew what it was supposed to mean, but at that point I was bored with arguments.

Why were they so short-lived; and was it right that Cliff Fox (the singer) was uncomfortable with the punk thing?

Cliff Fox was just this massive Bowie fan, and he saw the whole punk thing as a springboard to something else, which we all did … he wasn't like a real punk, he wasn't that interested in it. He just wanted to be Bowie .

What about your swastika backdrop …

We had swastika everything. But that was only for two gigs.

I think you went over that whole swastika thing in the 2001 interview.

Yeh, at the time obviously we should have known better, but at 16, 17 you're not supposed to know better, and that whole National Front thing, we'd never heard of the National Front. That whole Nazi thing hadn't happened yet. It's kind of obvious really, but it wasn't obvious to us, because we could see the swastika for what it was, it was just “a thing”, it meant Cabaret, Salon Kitty and all that. We just thought it was decadent, and stylish, we didn't know about concentration camps, and we certainly didn't know about National Front skinheads, they didn't exist yet. But we just took it literally for what it is, and expected everyone else to take it for what it is, but we were dealing with like a very small circle of people, we all knew what our influences were; once it went outside that circle, it was misunderstood. People don't really understand the irony of Salon Kitty, skinheads from Bradford weren't listening to Salon Kitty for the same reasons we were.

Moving onto the question of violence in 1976 and 77; that's something that's come up a lot particularly with regard to the early Ants, before your time, but you know they really had a hard following .. the soldier ants ..

Lots of bands had a hard following in those days. We're talking about the middle of 77, aren't we, and I hate to go back to Jimmy Pursey, because he thinks I have it in for him personally, and I don't actually, it's not what he meant to do at all, it just backfired … everything was taken literally and everything was taken at its most simple value, the most simple basic thing and it didn't really mean that, what it did mean I can't really describe to you but … and it was that thing … people from 76 didn't know what they were involved in, they didn't think they were involved in anything, they were doing what they did.

Do you think the 70s were just a violent time anyway? That's something we've had much debate about, whether there was just general violence or was it specifically aimed at punks. My experience was that it was specifically aimed at punks.

Yes, definitely, definitely.

  Part1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7

 Back To Top